Discernment, Part 7: The Classical Virtues in a Free Society

Before diving into the four classical virtues per se, let's consider a few general thoughts related to them. First of all, as we argued when we introduced the seven virtues as the foundation for a new order, we should care about private virtue and seek to cultivate it in our lives. In particular, the four classical, cardinal, or civic virtues can be known without revelation. Therefore, they are achievable by Christian and non-Christian alike as elements of the natural law that is written on our hearts (Romans 2:14-15).

Furthermore, historically it was discovered that liberal studies inculcate habits that produce the four classical virtues, and a liberal arts education should be designed to create habits of mind privately and publicly that form these virtues in our souls. Much of western civilization is built upon this theme, and, until recently in our history, it was universally recognized that virtuous citizens are essential to a free society. Now let's look at the four classical virtues themselves.

COURAGE or FORTITUDE is the opposite of tolerance, and tolerance actually obstructs the formation of virtue. Courage is the ability to do the thing that should be done despite significant opposition. If this is so, then the martyrdom of Czar Nicholas and Elizabeth Romanov was greater than the victory of Lenin, and Jesus Christ was the most courageous man who ever lived. These should be the models of courage held up in our classrooms, where the classes themselves should be academically challenging in order to develop the endurance needed for courage. Courage does not pray for tolerance, but for the victory of righteousness. It is never tragic when a righteous soldier dies. We must educate people to die well, not to live cowardly.

PRACTICAL WISDOM or PRUDENCE involves knowing how things work, knowing what needs to be done, the right time to do it, and how to do it. It is maximizing whatever one is and has in order to make the proper application. It is the public product of a harmonious soul expressing itself winsomely and appropriately. Therefore, the highest wisdom will manifest itself in practical wisdom.

MODERATION or TEMPERANCE is behaving in neither an excessive or a defective manner in a given situation. It is what the ancients called the golden mean. It embraces the notion of the lady and the gentleman, and does not apply to base things. That is, there is no golden mean of wickedness, but there is a balance necessary in the expression of love, since we might love either too much or too little. As for we the people, we live in an age that prizes radicalism. Defective or excessive people are newsworthy and entertaining. We are bored with temperance. This is even true in the church where we often tend to overreact to secularism with our own distorted brands of radicalism or extremism. Moderation or temperance must apply even to religious life since it is about living for the longer term as opposed to the shorter term, which often ends in burnout.

JUSTICE is giving each his due. It is treating equals as equals and unequals as unequals. Justice knows nothing of egalitarianism. Justice allows for uniqueness in function. That is, if I am gifted in music, then I get to lead worship and you don't. Slowing down gifted children to the pace of slower children is unjust. Taking from me the fruit of my labor in order to support an indolent is immoral. Therefore, justice is the capstone of the civic virtues. If there is no justice, there is no peace. In addition, justice is republican in nature. That is, a democracy is inherently egalitarian, whereas a republic such as the United States is inherently hierarchical and requires the Lordship of Christ over all areas of life in order to survive for the long haul.

As Christians, therefore, it is through the civic virtues that we can make common cause with the secular world. In fact, our Constitution is a document that takes the civic virtues as given within a predominantly Christian environment. It assumes that sacred traditions can be just as powerful as a written constitution. That is, although the Constitution refuses to legally establish the Christian religion and make others acknowledge the Lordship of Christ, it intentionally allows Christians to acknowledge Christ in all we say and do and continue lovingly to advise others to do the same. This is the key to national virtue. 

Therefore, even a "secular" government (that is, one that does not make everyone go to the same church) can leave space for all while acknowledging that we are a Christian nation in a broader sense and the Church as a non-taxable embassy and a sanctuary not under government control. The government can then legislate based on the civic virtues properly understood, recognizing the validity and the contribution of religious knowledge when it comes to defining the nature of persons and the core values of a free nation.

In our next post in this series, we will explore how the theological virtues of faith, hope, and charity may function within a free society to further strengthen the welfare of its citizens.

My thanks to Dr. John Mark Reynolds at Biola University whose lectures in the summer of 2006 had a substantial influence on the content of this essay.

Blessings,

Arnie Gentile

                                         Visit the Christian Apologetics Bookshop.

                      
                                              
      
                                                      

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 3/29/2010 2:11 PM Pastor Adam Barton wrote:
    I appreciate your comment about courage being the opposite of tolerance. Good thought.
    Thanks,
    Pastor Adam Barton
    Akron, Ohio
    Reply to this
    1. 3/29/2010 9:19 PM Arnie Gentile wrote:
      Thanks, Pastor Barton. I appreciate your participation. This is actually an insight I picked up from one of my former professors that has stayed with me. It's a simple thought that turns political correctness on its head and challenges the popular notion that tolerance is a virtue. To me, holding up tolerance as a virtue is kind of like going to a basketball game in order to cheer the officials.

      Blessings,

      Arnie
      Reply to this
  • 3/29/2010 2:23 PM Rosemary wrote:
    Very well explained. I would just leave out the part about the Romanovs. The "jury" is still out on them. Some view them as the rich man in Scripture who did not "see" poor Lazarus on his doorstep. At the very least, they were imprudent.
    Reply to this
    1. 3/29/2010 9:34 PM Arnie Gentile wrote:
      Thanks for your affirmation and your contribution, Rosemary. I actually wrestled a bit with whether or not to include the Romanovs because ot the controversy that swirls around them to this day. I agree that the Czar was anything but perfect, a poor political leader, and naive in a lot of ways, but I believe that he and his family were of better character than much of secular history has made them out to be. For what it's worth, the Orthodox Church canonized Nicholas, so at least they must have seen something in him of moral and spiritual substance.
       
      Blessings,

      Arnie 
      Reply to this
  • 12/31/2011 10:57 AM Michael Adams wrote:
    Thanks for your succinct explanation of the classical virtues. Even though I considered myself as a "mature," knowledgeable Christian before attending Biola in the early '90's, I was uninformed about their moral and theological significance until my education there. Because of my delayed exposure I later felt the need to introduce and discuss them with with younger Christians within the context of their spiritual formation, including my teenage son. Eventually, I discovered that the use of stories sparked the moral imagination in young people was far more affective than exclusively relying upon direct rational argument through lecture. The reading of fiction and biographies framed around the promotion of the virtues, both, classical and Christian, have proved helpful. In my convictions that young readers are best influenced by, and through, imagination, I published a fictional work titled The Doorkeeper: A Medieval Adventure. (available through Amazon Books). It is my hope that the Church will recapture the merits of using story to shape the hearts and minds of young people as they attempt to "work out their salvation." Our understanding and applying the virtues within our culture at-large groping for answers to life is surely akin to the mission of the Church.

    Ne Cede Malis,

    Michael
    Reply to this
    1. 12/31/2011 11:32 AM Arnie Gentile wrote:
      Hi, Michael,

      Thanks for your contribution both to my blog and to the Body of Christ through your book. However, I could not find your book on Amazon under the title you have given nor did a Google search reveal it. Is there another location out there where one could find it?

      Blessings,

      Arnie

      Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.